Jews
as Slave Traders |
Propaganda
regarding the Jewish participation in the slave trade continues to penetrate
into our colleges, the Internet and the Black media. It is composed
of gross exaggerations, half-truths and outright fabrications.
It is unfortunate that a large segment of the black community, and especially
black students, have been swayed by these spurious reports. Likewise unfortunate
is the absence of information made available to them by other sources
about the significant Jewish historical participation in anti-slavery
and human rights activities.
The black community has had
no exposure to information about Judaic civil rights activities since
the rupture between the blacks and the Jews was successfully fostered
by separatist black activists over thirty years ago. The split was launched
by characterizing the significant participation by Jews in the American
civil rights movement as patronizing. It continued with a calumnious magnification
of the Judaic role in the slave trade, spurred on by a book published
by the Nation of Islam in 1991, The
Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews.
The book declared that the Jews had "monumental culpability" for the slave
trade.
The historian, Eunice Pollack,
shocked by what she deemed "a monumental lie," was then "outraged that
newspapers kept on reprinting the charges without rebutting them."1
She was but one of a few voices
raised in protest. She petitioned the American Historical Association
to address the issue, and a resolution was issued by the AHA on Jan. 5,
1995 that "The AHA... condemns as false any statement alleging that Jews
played a disproportionate role in the exploitation of slave labor or in
the Atlantic slave trade."
By and large, however, the
media ignores the repetition of the demonstrably prejudicial charges on
college campuses, in the black press, and from many pulpits.
The characterization
of Jews as "monumentally culpable" for the slave trade befogs the age-old
participation of the Jewish people in the struggle for human rights.
Anti-Semitism among contemporary
blacks can be attributed to ignorance about the sacrifices many Jews made
in countering southern (as well as northern) bigotism.
The slaughter of Jewish civil rights workers by white supremists in the
South is neither remembered nor appreciated.
The citing of selected examples
of Jewish slave-trading
by anti-Semites such as City College professor Jeffries and Nation of
Islam leader Farrakhan lays a spurious scholarly foundation under anti-Semitic
trends among Afro-Americans.
Blacks suffer from the
prejudices imbued by self-styled black-power activists, for their attention
is diverted from the true causes of their status as second-class citizens.
The promulgators of the distorted
version of the heinous history of the slave trade ignore the involvement
of Arabs, Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch, English as well as Black
Africans. Even the Jewish press has not deigned to provide the facts.
Rebuttal of the ethnic calumnies is deemed to give too much attention
to them. The fact is that left unanswered the accusations remain believed.
What are the facts_ Anti-Semitic
propaganda deals with half-truths. That it is true that some Jews participated
in the slave trade is beside the point. Citing only those examples is
crassly misleading, inasmuch as the Jewish participation in trading in
slaves accounted for but a minuscule part of the massive commerce in human
flesh. Jews were even more in the minority as slave owners.
In
Slavery and the Jews: A Historical Inquiry,
authored by Eli Faber for the Jewish Studies Program of Hunter College,
Faber pointed out that the Portuguese were the first modern Europeans
to acquire African slaves when they explored African coasts in the early
1400's. The Portuguese thereafter dominated the slave trade for more than
a century until 1625. They transported no less than 4,190,000 blacks from
Africa to the Americas, or two fifths of the estimated total of 11,000,000
slaves sold on the American auction blocks.
The Spaniards were prohibited
in 1493 by the treaty of Tordesillas from trading in Africa. Nonetheless
they did obtain slaves through the Portuguese for Spain's New World acquisitions.
At the end of the 1500's Spaniards
became able to issue asientos,
licenses that gave foreigner holders the right to furnish Spanish colonies
with slaves. "The asiento
was so lucrative that it became the cause of thick intrigue, intricate
diplomacy, and war, as the Portuguese, the French, the Dutch, the English
and even Italian businessmen maneuvered to obtain it."
Jews could not obtain this
contract.
Faber documents the French
shipment of an estimated 1,150,000 slaves to the western hemisphere; the
English shipment of 2,463,000 slaves. The Dutch came in fifth place with
498,000 slaves.
Jewish participation in the
slave trade to the Americas was limited in the 15th and 16th centuries
because the Jews were
absent from the countries most engaged in slave trading . The Jews had
been expelled from Spain in 1492 and from Portugal in 1497. England did
not allow Jews to come back until the mid-seventeenth century.
England established the Royal
African Company in 1672. "The governor of the company was none other than
the king's brother, James, who was destined to become England's next king.
The Company's stockholders consisted most notably of other members of
the nobility, country gentlemen, ministers of the royal government, and,
from London, 15 Lords Mayor, 25 sheriffs, and 38 alderman....Among the
lengthy list of other major stockholders, not a single Jewish name appears."3
The only country in which
Jews participated to any significant degree in the slave trade was the
Netherlands. In 1656, seven out of 167 of the stockholders of the Dutch
West India Company were Jewish. In 1674 the number of shareholders rose
to a mere eleven out of 192.
Jewish settlement in the
northern USA was almost exclusively urban. Virtually no slaves were to
be found in Judaic households. Jewish colonists were absent from the English
colonies where slaves were employed in large numbers. Virginia, the largest
slaveholding state, had no Jewish inhabitants until the 1780's. Nor did
Maryland and North Carolina. The few Jews in South Carolina and Georgia
were likewise urban people.
There was one exception: Jews
in Surinam owned forty plantations and held nine thousand slaves in the
1690's. Jewish plantation ownership reached its peak in 1730 when 115
out of 401 plantations on the island were owned by Jews. This period was
of short duration; by 1787 Jewish plantation ownership declined to 46
out of 591.
The few Jews in France's three
slave-owning sugar islands in the Caribbean were expelled from the islands.
Did the Jews thereafter profit
from the slave trade in the New World_ Much is made by the anti-Semites
of the import of slaves by a few Jews in Rhode Island, a state which became
the "capital" of North American slave trade. How significant was this
traffic in the context of the total numbers of slaves imported through
Rhode Island ports_
"In all, 934 Rhode Island
vessels are known to have transported slaves to the western hemisphere
between 1709 and 1807. A total of 925 owners have been identified for
these ships, of whom only 42, or 4.5%, were Jewish. Furthermore, only
a minute fraction of slaves were carried on ships owned by Jewish merchants.
Shipowners whose religion is identifiable are known to have transported
a total of 64,708 slaves to the New World. Of these, only 1,275 slaves,
or 1.9%, traveled on vessels owned by Jews and non-Jews in partnership.
In contrast, 62,829 of the slaves, or 97 percent, were transported on
ships owned exclusively by Rhode Island's non-Jewish merchants."4
Aaron Lopez, a Rhode Island
Jewish importer, is cited by the hate-mongers as an exemplification of
egregious Jewish slave trading. The fact is that only 20 of the 200 ventures
by Lopez were slaving expeditions; they constitute the total of the 1,275
slaves noted above.
The key fact ignored by
the Nation of Islam purveyors of anti-Semitic propaganda is that the Europeans
could not have obtained the millions of slaves without
the participation of Islamic Arabs and Black Africans.
Arab slave dealers decimated
thousands of villages in the interior of Africa, slaughtering the old
and infirm, and bringing the remaining chain-linked captives to the coast
for sale to the Europeans. Over the course of a half millennium, in addition
to the 11,000,000 slaves sold in the Americas, Arabs transported more
millions of black slaves to Islamic slavemasters in the Mid-East and North
Africa as well as to
European colonies in the eastern hemisphere.
The Arabs would not have been
able to carry out their
slave-raiding activities to the extent they did
without the collaboration of black Africans. Tribes on the coast likewise
conducted raids into the interior, and, most importantly, performed as
middlemen between the Arab raiders and the Europeans.
Jews played no role
in the deplorable slave-raiding activities in the interior or on the coast
of Africa.
Islamic Arabs and Black Africans continued to trade in and employ slaves
into the mid-twentieth century!
Black Sudan is still guilty
of this heinous practice!
It is held to be "politically
incorrect" to discuss the involvement of Islamic Arabs and Black Africans
in this dismal page of human history.
The record is clear. Jews
have been taught from ancient times that the institution of slavery is
reprehensible, that its practice must be limited in time. During the age
when slavery was common to every land and people, the Talmud taught that
slaves must be treated with humanity and dignity. Punishment is prescribed
for those who abrogate these mitzvahs
(commandments). The Talmud teaches that Jewish slaves must be freed after
six years, and that "You shall sanctify the Jubilee year, declaring the
emancipation [of slaves] all over the world. This is your Jubilee year,
when each man shall return to his hereditary property and to his family."
No other culture of that time was made subject to such commandments.
|