For information about the origins of the glassmakers of Altare, see Fact Paper 25
See Fact Paper 6-I about the history of the process of vitrification
See Fact Paper 13-I and 13-II, Craftsmanship, a Judaic Tradition
See Fact Paper 6-II, Glassmaking, a Judaic Tradition
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
FIRST PAGE OF CHAPTER 2
THE SECRET ART
The origin of the process by which siliceous stone is
transformed into glass is referred to by the singular because it appears
to have been invented only once in all of human history. The peculiar
and particular conditions under which glass is artificially formulated
and produced remained a jealously guarded secret through the ages, a secret
contained within privileged groups. The custodians of the processes employed
in the production of glass were generally a family or other closely knit
group who transmitted their closely guarded knowledge from one generation
to the next. The seventeenth century BCE tablet, the
very first tablet which provides a name for glass and the formula by which
it is made, set a pattern of secrecy which endured for 4000 years, well
into the twentieth century.[The tablet
was referred to in chapter 1. Its inscription contained the Akkadian name
for glass: Zuka(k)-I, apparently the origin of the Hebrew name
Zakhukhit]. The ancient
tablet gave its translators much trouble, for it was deliberately cryptic.
R. Campbell Thompson had to deal with the fact that the oldest written
record of the art of glassmaking, inscribed in cuneiform Akkadian on an
Assyrian tablet, was also rendered in an obtuse cryptogrammic script,
deliberately employed to conceal the knowledge from all but the initiated
of the glassmaker’s society. Thompson did not find this literary camouflage
unusual. He noted that "it has always been the outrageous custom
of certain learned circles to conceal their knowledge from the lay public
in a fog of jargon, a pomposity of mannerisms, due, it is hoped, less
to personal vanity than to professional protection." Thompson quotes
a Kassite tablet of the mid-second millennium:... [End of first page of chapter 2...]
|
||||||
|
|
EGYPTIAN [SIC] GLASS
The process of producing glass first took place in Akkadia, a fact demonstrable by the antiquity of the artifacts found in the region and substantiated by the existence of the requisite technology. Yet the legend that the art originated in Egypt persists, and although a negative fact is more difficult to substantiate, it can be reasonably argued that the Egyptians did not and could not have invented the process, not merely because the most ancient manufactured glass was not found in Egypt but because ancient Egypt never developed the pyrotechnology requisite for the production of glass. The evidence that the art, the artisans and the artifacts were foreign to ancient Egypt has far-reaching ramifications. At the core of the issue is the realization that the requisite pyrotechnology remained secluded in a corner of western Asia for two millennia, the same area in which the axled wheel emerged and the Bronze and Iron Ages materialized. Thus the art of glassmaking provides the lens with which we can focus upon that area for a clear view of the evolution of civilization. So firmly accepted was the legend of ancient Egyptian
glassmaking that, until recently, little effort was made to substantiate
its verity. The quality of scientific lore regarding the subject can be
judged by the circumstance pointed out in a dissertation by Earle R, Caley
wherein he notes that until 1957 only 14 ancient Egyptian glass items
had been analyzed by Neumann...
[...End of first page of chapter 3...]
|
||||||
|
|
INGOTS OF GLASS
A 65-foot-long merchant vessel, which sank off the southwest coast of Turkey at the turn of the fourteenth century BCE with all of its considerable cargo stowed securely on board, is one of the most spectacular archaeological finds of recent times. The cargo of the ship, much of it intact and reasonably well preserved, provides an unprecedented insight into the period. Included in that cargo were seven-inch-diameter ingots of raw glass, the earliest ever found, which were clearly on their way to a destination where they would be remelted and transformed into precious jewels, amulets, furniture inlays, goblets or other vessels. The shipwreck lies 140 feet and more below the surface of the sea along one of the sea lanes traversed by the Myceneans and the Canaanites. The ill-fated vessel sank off Ulu Burun, the third of a series of lonely intrusions of the Taurus Mountains into the sea south of the picturesque seaside town of Kas. No shore exists, for the walls of the jagged promontory plunge directly into the sea. There, posed against the massive cliff, a white vessel rests at anchor: the research vessel of the Institute of Nautical Archaeology (INA), Virazon, is a fairly sizable vessel, yet it appears puny, overpowered by the sheer wall of the mountain which provides a backdrop to the scene. It is anchored 50 meters offshore directly above the ancient vessel which lay at the bottom untouched for 3300 years. The archaeologist’s encampment is implanted at various
levels on protrusions of the rocky precipice. Ladders spring from one
jerry-built screened enclosure to another fixed into the cliff above it;
the research room... [...End of first page of chapter 4...]
|
||||||
|
|
THE IRON AGE
The crossroads of Canaan became an area of contention between the surrounding powers with the erosion of the hegemony of the Egyptian overlords in the area. Struggles with the Hittites and the Amorites, the intrusions of the Sea-Peoples and others all contributed to unstable conditions and to a hiatus in technological development. Stagnation continued until the re-emergence of local control spurred the dramatic birth of a new, progressive era. The new seminal era unfolded in the latter half of the thirteenth century BCE, the very period attributed biblically and archaeologically to the settlement of Israelite refugees on the hills of Canaan. Two outstanding events were instrumental in transforming the character of civilization: One was the efflorescence of alphabetic writing, which first appeared during the reign of the Semitic kings over Egypt, the much-maligned Hyksos, forecasting a revolutionary surge in communication and in the transference of knowledge. The second event was the proliferation of advanced pyrotechnology and metallurgy which ushered in the Iron Age. We quote from the writings of William G. Dever, a brilliant archaeologist who, far from following biblical lore, renounced even the use of the term "Biblical Archaeology" as being scientifically unjustifiable. Dever, adhering to strict archaeological evidence, identifies the advent of the Iron Age with that of the establishment of "hundreds of small unwalled" Israelite villages of the late thirteenth-twelfth centuries: "The economy of these Iron I villages was largely
self-sufficient, based mainly...
[...End of first page of chapter 5...]
|
||||||
|
|
THE SECOND DIASPORA
It is unlikely that any ancient Roman ever made glass. Glassmaking technology, although already 2000 years old at the time of the birth of the Roman Empire, was unknown to the Romans until after they had launched their well-ordered campaign to conquer the world, Once they had become conquerors, Romans could scarcely deign to engage in the rigorous, perverse, sweaty toil which the production of glass and its products entailed, even if they had become privy to the secrets of the trade. Roman law was designed to maintain a facade of superiority over subject peoples; the law precluded the Roman upper classes from engaging in such a lowly activity and dissuaded any Roman citizen from so doing, for to do so was to stoop to the level of a slave, or, at best, to the demeaning social status of a foreign laborer, Conquering people disdain to engage in manual labor; artisanship is scarcely a goal to which conquerors htmlire, Arts and crafts are regarded by a self-styled master race as odious occupations relegated to inferior peoples. The product is admired, but the practice is scorned. Among the privileges accruing to conquerors is the power to oblige the vanquished, whether as slaves, serfs, or freemen to perform all manual labor. The Romans were no different in this regard than were the Greeks, whose culture they had absorbed, especially when it came to abjuring participation in as difficult a discipline as making glass and glassware, "To the Greeks glass was something new; to the Romanssomething unknown," unequivocally states...
|
||||||
|
|
THE GLASSBLOWERS
|
||||||
|
|
THE LINEN, GLASS,
SPICE, AND SILK ROUTE
|
||||||
|
|
THE SASSANIAN
EXPERIENCE
|
||||||
|
|
THE JEWISH
KHAZARS
On five historic occasions, Jews became kings or kings became Jews. Five times Jews were integrated into an institution which was in contradiction to their culture and repugnant to their philosophy. Jews became kings in Egypt after the time of Joseph, and boosted Egyptian culture and technology to new heights of sophistication. They became kings in Israel and Judah, where Jewish rulers reigned for a period longer than twice the age of the United States. Judaism was adopted by the royal house of the Yemenite kingdom of Himyar under Yusuf Asar Dhu Nuwas (ruling ca. 517-525). Eight North African Berber tribes converted to Judaism and fought bravely under their warrior Queen Kahena, And kings became Jews in Khazaria. The Khazars were pastoral people who swept in from the vast, windswept savannahs of Asia onto the steppes of present-day southern Russia in the sixth century of the Christian Era. They were an important part of the ongoing westward movement of pastoral Turkic peoples who fanned out across the vast Russian plains: The Magyars moved on up to what is now Finland and ended up in Hungary. The Avars, Sabirs and Bulgars occupied the Danube basin. The Khazars followed the Kok Turks and spread out along the northern flanks of the Caucasus Mountains, skirting the Aral and Chtmlian and Black Seas. The tent-dwelling, horse-riding, Khazar herdsmen absorbed some of the peoples of that hilly area, allied themselves with others, and became transformed into a sedentary nation. The derivation of the name "Khazar" is a subject
of continued speculation... [...End of first page of chapter 10...]
|
||||||
|
|
THE BYZANTINES
Jews resided in Greece, Macedonia and Illyria in the Hellenistic period, having arrived at least as early as the fourth century BCE, at the time of Alexander the Great’s thrust into the East. Many of these Hellenic Jews came from the already ancient communities of Anatolia and others from Eretz Israel. Direct descendants of these early adventurers into the eastern Dihtmlora are known as the Romaniots, and they are still to be found speaking their own Judeo-Greek dialect in Janina, Trikkala, Chalcis, Volos, and especially in Corfu. The Romaniot community is distinct from the Graeco-Jewish community, descending from another, later influx of Sephardic Jews who speak their own language, Ladino. The early Jewish settlers from the East enjoyed autonomy in communal affairs, including their own system of jurisprudence. Commercial affairs were likewise controlled by an ephorus, a Jewish overseer, who set and controlled market prices, weights and measures. These standards were not only applicable to internal Jewish commerce, but to all trade, and particularly to international commercial intercourse. The Romans, and even the first Christian emperors, had to accept this Jewish quasi-governmental authority because the Jews were key to the conduct of commerce and crafts. Glassmaking may have been practiced in Corinth on the
Peloponnesian peninsula during the period of Roman hegemony. The circumstances
and time of the introduction of glassmaking into Corinth from the East
are unknown, but glassware-making, if not glassmaking, were certainly
practiced on the Peloponnesian peninsula during the Roman period. It is
clear that the strategically situated city played a central role in the
history of glassmaking... [...End of first page of chapter 11...] .
|
||||||